Executive Communication in Action · Track 5 · Strategic Closure & Follow-Through

Everyone nodded. By Friday, nothing had moved.

Two reasons closes fail — and two disciplines that make them mean something.

~90 minutes
One focused session · live + async
One tool by Tuesday
One anchored follow-through for a real open agreement
Thinker-first
Fisher-Ury & Fogg as your lenses
Next cohort
mid-August 2026 · small by design

The problem

A meeting can end in agreement
and still produce nothing.

You have been in that meeting. It looked like a yes. Two things quietly killed it: people closed on positions — what each side said they wanted — instead of interests; and follow-through was designed to depend on willpower. Neither was ever going to survive the week. This Track fixes both.

Why now

AI can schedule the reminder. It cannot make the behaviour happen.

A bot can send 'we'll follow up.' But behaviour happens only when motivation, ability, and a prompt meet at once — and designing that anchor is judgment, not automation. The close that holds is still yours to build.

The thinker — your lens

You don't borrow tips. You inhabit an architecture.

The lens is theirs; the practice is yours. You meet the thinker in an original reading, see the idea in use, then make it your own.

Fisher & Ury
Getting to Yes, 1981

Positions lock people in; interests open space for options that actually work. Close on the why, not the stated what.

BJ Fogg
Tiny Habits, 2019

Behaviour happens when motivation, ability, and a prompt meet. 'We'll follow up' has no ability and no prompt.

The instrument

Two disciplines, one durable close.

Close on what each side actually needs — and design follow-through small enough, and anchored well enough, to survive the week.

01
Positions vs interests
Get past what was said to why it was wanted.
02
Options that work
Open space the positions had closed.
03
Anchored action
Attach the next step to something that already happens.
04
Motivation · ability · prompt
Design the close so the behaviour actually fires.

What you leave with

Not tips. A capability.

Who conducts it

Thirty-five years of executive judgment — now in the AI era.

Sandra M. Szwarc, M.Sc. has spent 35 years training executives to construct meaning under pressure — across finance, industry, energy and healthcare, in four languages. Strategic Narratives is where that practice meets the AI era: the machine can describe; you decide what the data means.

FAAP — Storytelling & Game WritingVancouver Film SchoolColumbia Digital Storytelling LabM.Sc. UNIP + University of North Texas35+ years executive education17 DOI-registered worksIP registered (INPI · Zenodo · Biblioteca Nacional)

Fit4Global Learning Systems®

The other doors

Five Tracks. Take one — or make the journey.

Strategic Closure & Follow-Through is one of five Mini-Masterclasses in Executive Communication in Action. Each is a door: roughly 90 minutes, one usable tool, sold on its own or as the full program.

Begin

Make your closures mean something.

Join the next cohort, bring it to your team, or take it as a standalone. Part of the ECA full program — also available on its own.

Join the next cohort (mid-August)Bring it to your team
Is this about negotiation?

In part. Fisher and Ury's framework comes from negotiation — but here it applies to everyday closes: meetings, project agreements, cross-functional decisions, stakeholder alignment.

What is an 'anchored action'?

A Fogg principle: attach a new action to something that already happens. Not 'I'll send the update,' but 'After Monday's standup, I send the CFO one number.'

Do I need MM4 first?

No. It is standalone. In the program it closes the arc, but it works independently.

When does it run?

The next cohort is mid-August 2026. Small by design.

Part of Executive Communication in Action — five Tracks, one capability: communication as judgment.